Hate Speech and Political Discourse in the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia: A Comparative Legal Analysis

Stevanović, Aleksandar (2025) Hate Speech and Political Discourse in the Countries of the Former Yugoslavia: A Comparative Legal Analysis. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 44 (1-2). pp. 109-138. ISSN 0350-2694

Text Hate Speech and Political Discourse....pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (363kB)

Abstract

This paper aims to critically analyze the regulation of hate speech within political discourse in the post-Yugoslav region. Emphasis is placed on two interconnected aspects: the conceptual and normative foundations behind the idea of hate speech, and a comparative review of legal frameworks and judicial responses across selected jurisdictions. The first section conducts a normative and theoretical analysis to clarify the legal and theoretical foundations of hate speech and political expression in general. Using international human rights instruments, relevant jurisprudence, and key theoretical literature, this section outlines the definitional boundaries and core characteristics of hate speech. Special emphasis is placed on the normative tension between protecting political discourse, which is considered the foundation of democratic society, and the legal limits used to protect individuals and groups from incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence. The analysis also tackles the difficulties in differentiating hate speech from controversial or offensive, yet legally acceptable, political expression, especially when discussing sensitive topics like ethnicity, religion, or historical memory. The second section uses a comparative legal approach to examine the regulatory frameworks governing hate speech in the successor states of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. Although all these jurisdictions have officially aligned their legal systems with international standards, especially those of the Council of Europe, differences remain in how hate speech is implemented, interpreted, and treated by courts. While Slovenia and Croatia, as EU member states, are bound by the relevant acquis communautaire, the other states, although still outside the EU, have pursued similar legislative paths in anticipation of joining. This section, therefore, examines both the common elements and jurisdiction-specific differences to identify patterns, inconsistencies, and potential best practices. Special focus is given to instances of hate speech that have been influenced by, and still reflect, the ethno-political conflicts and wartime narratives of the 1990s. The main goal of the research is to develop analytically based criteria for distinguishing hate speech from protected political expression, considering the specific contexts of post-conflict, transitional societies in the former Yugoslav countries.

Actions (login required)

View Item